Skip to content
Dark Blue Abstract Technology LinkedIn Banner

From Mandates to Momentum— a Payer Focused Video Series

With the enforcement date of CMS-0057-F—January 1st 2027—fast approaching, a lot of Payers are attempting to modernize their Prior Auth workflow requirements. The requirements of the mandates have a large technical aspect, however, there are operational and strategic considerations as well as managing relationships with Providers.

This 4-part video series offers payers essential context and actionable steps to make smarter CMS compliance investments—both in the short and long term—while reducing burdens, streamlining operations and providing better provider/member experiences. Each video explores a key area of focus, including: 

Video #1: Evolving Tech Stack for PriorAuth and Beyond

In this video, you’ll learn:

How Payers can navigate the evolution of Prior Authorization (PA) modernization, especially under CMS-0057-F.

How to manage operations and technical evolution of legacy standards—like X12—while adapting to new technologies like FHIR®.

What to expect as PriorAuth shifts from manual to automated workflows, and what that means for Provider relationships.

How to balance near-term requirements with long-term strategy.

Book a Meeting with a Smile Representitive

Selecting a Vendor-Partner

Selecting a CMS interoperability vendor isn’t just about getting compliant. It’s about future-proofing your organization, empowering better member experiences, and driving real ROI from your data strategy. When choosing a vendor-partner, make sure to:

✓ Ask vendors to walk you through their product roadmap

Look for:

A vision that extends beyond regulatory compliance.
Technical evidence that they’re not just standing up APIs to ‘check-the-box’, and have demonstrable solutions that improve and streamline workflows.
Plans (and technology) to evolve into new use cases, such as risk adjustment, and care-gap closure that would enhance member and provider satisfaction.

✓ Ask about their tenure and depth of expertise?

Don’t just ask if they “support FHIR.” Dig deeper:

Are they based on a FHIR-native architecture?
Do they actively participate in HL7 Technical Working Groups or help shape industry guidance?
Do they have experience and expertise with Da Vinci Implementation Guides (IGs), and innovating with CQL?
How do they leverage AI in their tooling? Do they use a deterministic evidence-based approach, or a probability-based approach?

✓ Confirm Scalability and Provider-Readiness?

Do they offer technical and support services for provider education and onboarding support?
Can they handle workflows like CDA ingestion and clinical data reconciliation?
Are their systems battle-tested at scale in real-world implementations?

ligh bulb dark blue-1

Our recommendation is to look for FHIR-first vendor-partners, who can meet you where you are today, and help you mature along your future roadmap. 

 

Video #2: True Cost-Saving Potential of Compliance Investments

In this video, you’ll learn:

Why simply meeting the CMS 0057-F mandate with APIs isn't enough to deliver ROI.

How intelligent automation—paired with high-quality data—reduces the true cost of prior authorization.

 

The potential for tens of millions in savings by reducing the $16 per-transaction PA cost through automation.

How to build a strong financial justification strategy to secure internal funding and leadership buy-in.

Book a Meeting with a Smile Representitive

Health Applications You Can Trust

Going Beyond the Mandates—Smart Business Steps for Payers

Standing up the APIs associated with CMS-0057-F isn’t enough. Progressive Payers are modernizing their infrastructure to reduce administrative costs and burdens, and create a base of quality data upon which intelligent automations can run. When choosing a compliance vendor-partner, make sure to: 

✓ Ask the vendor to prove their data quality abilities at scale

Look for:

A data strategy that goes beyond API enablement and into data normalization, enrichment, and deduplication—essential for powering downstream use cases.
Tools and automation that detect and correct data issues in real-time.
An architecture that supports comprehensive, longitudinal records and analytics-ready data.

✓ Understand how the vendor platform enables use cases beyond mandates

Can the vendor help you activate your data for:

Risk adjustment and quality programs?
Real-time prior authorization and care coordination?
Utilization management or member engagement initiatives?

✓ Understand how the vendor is using AI

Is the vendor:

Leveraging clinical guidelines and industry best practices?
Able to prove consistent and accurate PA adjudications?
Able to use an AI approach that resolves systemic biases, and is transparent and auditable?

ligh bulb dark blue-1

Our recommendation is to view the compliance investment as a way to mature along your strategic roadmap, well beyond the regulatory requirements of the Final Rule. 

 

Video #3: How Da Vinci IGs Improve Implementation Efficiency

In this video, you’ll learn:

The massive benefits of implementing IGs, even though they are only recommended by CMS.

How to improve payer-provider relationships with burden-less PA workflows.

How a FHIR-first and CQL platform is able to meet the requirements of the June 2025 US Payer Pledge for Prior Auth.

Book a Meeting with a Smile Representitive

Health Applications You Can Trust

Steps for Payers to Improve Efficiency with Compliance Implementations

Step One: Get Familiar with FHIR and the Da Vinci IGs

Allocate time for technical, business, and clinical teams to review the relevant Da Vinci IGs.

Ensure teams understand the business problem each IG solves, along with the workflows it enables.

Provide training on FHIR fundamentals if teams aren’t already proficient.

Step Two: Conduct a Thorough Internal Assessment

Map your current prior authorization process end-to-end, including all provider touch-points, manual step and downstream systems involved.

Review your current technology stack.

Assess your privacy and security protocols in light of external-facing APIs and new data exchange requirements.

Step Three: Create a Detailed, Work-back Project Plan

Use the January 1, 2027 CMS deadline as your work-back date

Align internal milestones, testing, and change management efforts to the timeline.

Step Four: Engage with Vendor-Partners

View your vendors as partners. Share assessment findings and collaborate on how their solutions can help you meet compliance requirements.

Assess vendor capabilities with detailed, specific questions:

Is the vendor FHIR-first (FHIR-native), or do they rely on transformation layers?
Which versions of CRD, DTR, and PAS IGs does the vendor support today?
What is the vendor’s roadmap for adopting new versions or new IGs?
Can the vendor demo a working implementation of FHIR and Da Vinci IGs?
What professional services does the vendor offer for IG implementation and integration?

ligh bulb dark blue-1

Our recommendation is to choose a FHIR-first vendor so that the technology you invest in today, is tomorrow-ready.

 

Video #4: The Compliance Roadmap Beyond Prior Auth

In this video, you’ll learn:

How and why progressive Payers are codifying payer and medical policies

What type of data engine can meet the CMS mandates, and the Payer Pledge for Prior Auth

Why Payers don’t have worry about solving individual use-cases (like PA and quality measures) anymore 

Book a Meeting with a Smile Representitive

How Smile is Leading the Way

#1 Expertise: Leading the Way

Smile maintains the HL7 FHIR standard and our platform is the world’s most proven implementation.

Smile is actively shaping industry standards by leading 31+ HL7 FHIR Working Groups.

Smile’s CQL engine has been live in production for over 8 years, well before most vendors began investing in CQL for FHIR-based HEDIS measures.

Key player in NCQA’s DQIC—Digital Quality Implementers Community—a key initiative validating vendor solutions against digital HEDIS measures.

#2 Solution: Powered by FHIR and CQL

Fully compliant with CMS Prior Authorization (0057-F) requirements.

Proven real-time prior authorization adjudication using codified medical policy, FHIR and CQL.

Meets transparency expectations outlined in the Prior Authorization Payer Pledge.

First and only vendor validated by NCQA under their new digital measure validation framework.

Enterprise-scale processing, benchmarked at 5 billion data points (for 5 million members) in under 12.5 hours.

ligh bulb dark blue-1

Our recommendation: don’t worry. Contact Smile for your unique compliance and clinical intelligence implementations. 

Start Deriving Value from Your Compliance Investment. Contact Us Today