With the enforcement date of CMS-0057-F—January 1st 2027—fast approaching, a lot of Payers are attempting to modernize their Prior Auth workflow requirements. The requirements of the mandates have a large technical aspect, however, there are operational and strategic considerations as well as managing relationships with Providers.
This 4-part video series offers payers essential context and actionable steps to make smarter CMS compliance investments—both in the short and long term—while reducing burdens, streamlining operations and providing better provider/member experiences. Each video explores a key area of focus, including:
Video #1: Evolving Tech Stack for PriorAuth and Beyond
In this video, you’ll learn:
✓ How Payers can navigate the evolution of Prior Authorization (PA) modernization, especially under CMS-0057-F.
✓ How to manage operations and technical evolution of legacy standards—like X12—while adapting to new technologies like FHIR®.
✓ What to expect as PriorAuth shifts from manual to automated workflows, and what that means for Provider relationships.
✓ How to balance near-term requirements with long-term strategy.
Book a Meeting with a Smile Representitive
Selecting a Vendor-Partner
Selecting a CMS interoperability vendor isn’t just about getting compliant. It’s about future-proofing your organization, empowering better member experiences, and driving real ROI from your data strategy. When choosing a vendor-partner, make sure to:
Look for:
● A vision that extends beyond regulatory compliance.
● Technical evidence that they’re not just standing up APIs to ‘check-the-box’, and have demonstrable solutions that improve and streamline workflows.
● Plans (and technology) to evolve into new use cases, such as risk adjustment, and care-gap closure that would enhance member and provider satisfaction.
Don’t just ask if they “support FHIR.” Dig deeper:
● Are they based on a FHIR-native architecture?
● Do they actively participate in HL7 Technical Working Groups or help shape industry guidance?
● Do they have experience and expertise with Da Vinci Implementation Guides (IGs), and innovating with CQL?
● How do they leverage AI in their tooling? Do they use a deterministic evidence-based approach, or a probability-based approach?
● Do they offer technical and support services for provider education and onboarding support?
● Can they handle workflows like CDA ingestion and clinical data reconciliation?
● Are their systems battle-tested at scale in real-world implementations?
Our recommendation is to look for FHIR-first vendor-partners, who can meet you where you are today, and help you mature along your future roadmap.
Video #2: True Cost-Saving Potential of Compliance Investments
In this video, you’ll learn:
✓ Why simply meeting the CMS 0057-F mandate with APIs isn't enough to deliver ROI.
✓ How intelligent automation—paired with high-quality data—reduces the true cost of prior authorization.
✓ The potential for tens of millions in savings by reducing the $16 per-transaction PA cost through automation.
✓ How to build a strong financial justification strategy to secure internal funding and leadership buy-in.
Book a Meeting with a Smile Representitive
Health Applications You Can Trust
Going Beyond the Mandates—Smart Business Steps for Payers
Standing up the APIs associated with CMS-0057-F isn’t enough. Progressive Payers are modernizing their infrastructure to reduce administrative costs and burdens, and create a base of quality data upon which intelligent automations can run. When choosing a compliance vendor-partner, make sure to:
Look for:
● A data strategy that goes beyond API enablement and into data normalization, enrichment, and deduplication—essential for powering downstream use cases.
● Tools and automation that detect and correct data issues in real-time.
● An architecture that supports comprehensive, longitudinal records and analytics-ready data.
Can the vendor help you activate your data for:
● Risk adjustment and quality programs?
● Real-time prior authorization and care coordination?
● Utilization management or member engagement initiatives?
Is the vendor:
● Leveraging clinical guidelines and industry best practices?
● Able to prove consistent and accurate PA adjudications?
● Able to use an AI approach that resolves systemic biases, and is transparent and auditable?
Our recommendation is to view the compliance investment as a way to mature along your strategic roadmap, well beyond the regulatory requirements of the Final Rule.
Video #3: How Da Vinci IGs Improve Implementation Efficiency
In this video, you’ll learn:
✓ The massive benefits of implementing IGs, even though they are only recommended by CMS.
✓ How to improve payer-provider relationships with burden-less PA workflows.
✓ How a FHIR-first and CQL platform is able to meet the requirements of the June 2025 US Payer Pledge for Prior Auth.
Book a Meeting with a Smile Representitive
Health Applications You Can Trust
Steps for Payers to Improve Efficiency with Compliance Implementations
● Allocate time for technical, business, and clinical teams to review the relevant Da Vinci IGs.
● Ensure teams understand the business problem each IG solves, along with the workflows it enables.
● Provide training on FHIR fundamentals if teams aren’t already proficient.
● Map your current prior authorization process end-to-end, including all provider touch-points, manual step and downstream systems involved.
● Review your current technology stack.
● Assess your privacy and security protocols in light of external-facing APIs and new data exchange requirements.
● Use the January 1, 2027 CMS deadline as your work-back date
● Align internal milestones, testing, and change management efforts to the timeline.
● View your vendors as partners. Share assessment findings and collaborate on how their solutions can help you meet compliance requirements.
● Assess vendor capabilities with detailed, specific questions:
● Is the vendor FHIR-first (FHIR-native), or do they rely on transformation layers?
● Which versions of CRD, DTR, and PAS IGs does the vendor support today?
● What is the vendor’s roadmap for adopting new versions or new IGs?
● Can the vendor demo a working implementation of FHIR and Da Vinci IGs?
● What professional services does the vendor offer for IG implementation and integration?
Our recommendation is to choose a FHIR-first vendor so that the technology you invest in today, is tomorrow-ready.
Video #4: The Compliance Roadmap Beyond Prior Auth
In this video, you’ll learn:
✓ How and why progressive Payers are codifying payer and medical policies
✓ What type of data engine can meet the CMS mandates, and the Payer Pledge for Prior Auth
✓ Why Payers don’t have worry about solving individual use-cases (like PA and quality measures) anymore
Book a Meeting with a Smile Representitive
Health Applications You Can Trust
How Smile is Leading the Way
● Smile maintains the HL7 FHIR standard and our platform is the world’s most proven implementation.
● Smile is actively shaping industry standards by leading 31+ HL7 FHIR Working Groups.
● Smile’s CQL engine has been live in production for over 8 years, well before most vendors began investing in CQL for FHIR-based HEDIS measures.
● Key player in NCQA’s DQIC—Digital Quality Implementers Community—a key initiative validating vendor solutions against digital HEDIS measures.
● Fully compliant with CMS Prior Authorization (0057-F) requirements.
● Proven real-time prior authorization adjudication using codified medical policy, FHIR and CQL.
● Meets transparency expectations outlined in the Prior Authorization Payer Pledge.
● First and only vendor validated by NCQA under their new digital measure validation framework.
● Enterprise-scale processing, benchmarked at 5 billion data points (for 5 million members) in under 12.5 hours.
Our recommendation: don’t worry. Contact Smile for your unique compliance and clinical intelligence implementations.